Skip to main content
Young Female Professional worker

Cost of living pressures

According to Bank of America, almost three-quarters of Generation Z have adapted their spending in response to higher living costs. Non-essential purchases are down, essentials take priority. For mobility, this signals a generation entering senior roles with a cautious mindset. Will they see relocation as risk or as opportunity — and how can policies help tip the balance?

Financial security as expectation

The Financial Times reports that 69 per cent of Generation Z worry about outliving their savings. This caution does not have to be a barrier; it can be an opportunity. Employers who design relocation benefits that provide clarity and stability may win the trust of tomorrow’s leaders. Could secure, transparent mobility policies become a differentiator in attracting and retaining talent?

Young person working with a team in an office

Purpose as a driver

Research from People Matters shows that most Generation Z and millennials see purpose as central to their job satisfaction. Many change roles based on sustainability and values. What does this mean for relocation? Simply put, programmes that ignore inclusivity or sustainability risk being seen as outdated.

Learning from the past

We have seen before what happens when efficiency is prioritised above experience. Lump sum packages once promised freedom and cost control, but for many employees they created confusion and stress. The lesson for mobility is clear: socio-economic signals must not be reduced to spreadsheets. They need to be interpreted in the context of lived experience.

Two horticulture workers

Closing thoughts

Socio-economic factors are already shaping how mobility is experienced today. The challenge for leaders is to respond to these signals with programmes that feel both supportive and resilient.

Download our guide: Next Horizon: Shaping Global Mobility for a Changing Workforce